<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcasting or time shifting &#8211; by Tony Moorey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onegoldensquare.com/2008/07/podcasting-or-time-shifting-by-tony-moorey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onegoldensquare.com/2008/07/podcasting-or-time-shifting-by-tony-moorey/</link>
	<description>Blog to discuss the creation of a new radio brand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:23:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Moorey</title>
		<link>http://onegoldensquare.com/2008/07/podcasting-or-time-shifting-by-tony-moorey/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Moorey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onegoldensquare.com/?p=65#comment-201</guid>
		<description>I think I might not have taken enough care in the choice of my words. Perhaps the post should read “The Guardian *understandably* takes a dim view of commercial radio”. As an ardent listener and fan of your podcasts, I think I would agree with the opinions expressed in Media Talk about the overall standard of Britain’s commercial radio output.

My supposition was that the influx of new sources of audio programming is a very good thing for both listeners and the radio business; never before has there been such a wide range of programming from a more varied set of voices. I would hope that commercial radio sees the likes of yourself as a spur to greater creativity and a reason to raise its own standards.

How’s that for spreading the love?

Tony Moorey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I might not have taken enough care in the choice of my words. Perhaps the post should read “The Guardian *understandably* takes a dim view of commercial radio”. As an ardent listener and fan of your podcasts, I think I would agree with the opinions expressed in Media Talk about the overall standard of Britain’s commercial radio output.</p>
<p>My supposition was that the influx of new sources of audio programming is a very good thing for both listeners and the radio business; never before has there been such a wide range of programming from a more varied set of voices. I would hope that commercial radio sees the likes of yourself as a spur to greater creativity and a reason to raise its own standards.</p>
<p>How’s that for spreading the love?</p>
<p>Tony Moorey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wells</title>
		<link>http://onegoldensquare.com/2008/07/podcasting-or-time-shifting-by-tony-moorey/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onegoldensquare.com/?p=65#comment-172</guid>
		<description>We might take a dim view of much of what passes for commercial radio at the moment (see Media Talks passim) but in fact we have a close association with our brothers and sisters in GMG Radio. We share material, Smooth produces a daily news bulletin for our news podcast, and we even poached one of their producers. Share the love!

Matt Wells, head of audio - the Guardian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We might take a dim view of much of what passes for commercial radio at the moment (see Media Talks passim) but in fact we have a close association with our brothers and sisters in GMG Radio. We share material, Smooth produces a daily news bulletin for our news podcast, and we even poached one of their producers. Share the love!</p>
<p>Matt Wells, head of audio &#8211; the Guardian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon hayes budgen</title>
		<link>http://onegoldensquare.com/2008/07/podcasting-or-time-shifting-by-tony-moorey/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>simon hayes budgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onegoldensquare.com/?p=65#comment-170</guid>
		<description>The Guardian takes a dim view of commercial radio, does it? That&#039;s bad news for Century, Smooth, Real and Rock Radios, all of which it owns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Guardian takes a dim view of commercial radio, does it? That&#8217;s bad news for Century, Smooth, Real and Rock Radios, all of which it owns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podcasting or time shifting - by Tony Moorey</title>
		<link>http://onegoldensquare.com/2008/07/podcasting-or-time-shifting-by-tony-moorey/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Podcasting or time shifting - by Tony Moorey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onegoldensquare.com/?p=65#comment-147</guid>
		<description>[...] See more here: Podcasting or time shifting - by Tony Moorey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See more here: Podcasting or time shifting &#8211; by Tony Moorey [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

